Preparation and Formulation of Ocusert using Dipping and Solvent Casting Technique

Authors

  • haider hussein kikawoos Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Athmar Dhahir Habeeb Al-Shohani Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Asma Buanz School of Science, Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Kent, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32947/ajps.v25i5.1319

Keywords:

Ocusert, ocular drug delivery, rate-controlling membrane, Sulfacetamide sodium, solvent casting, dipping method

Abstract

Background: One of the primary challenges in ocular drug delivery is maintaining therapeutic drug concentrations at the target site for a prolonged duration. This is particularly relevant for sulfacetamide sodium, a commonly used antibacterial agent in ophthalmic therapy.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a polymer-based ocular insert (Ocusert) for the extended release of sulfacetamide sodium over a 12-hour period.

Dipping and solvent casting method: Various formulations were developed using the dipping and solvent casting technique, with sodium alginate, polyvinylpyrrolidone K90 (PVP K90), and Eudragit RL PO. The inserts were evaluated for physical and functional properties, including folding endurance, thickness, drug content, swelling index, and in vitro drug release. The optimal formulations were further examined via ex vivo bioadhesion and ex vivo permeation studies using goat corneal tissue.

Results: All formulations demonstrated: pH (6.91–6.99), drug content (4.67 -5.26) mg, drug content percent (93.43%–105.26%), Thickness (0.11-0.53) mm, and weight variation (13.41-81.30) mg. Among them, formulation F14C—containing 1.5% sodium alginate, 7% PVP K90, and 15% Eudragit RL PO—exhibited controlled drug release for up to 12 hours, high folding endurance of over 300 times, swelling index of 242.96%, drug release kinetics of zero order, ex vivo bio-adhesive strength of 0.183 ± 0.016 g, a force of adhesion of 0.083 ± 0.016 N, a tensile strength of 3.116 ± 0.18 (N/mm²), a percent elongation of 358.87% ± 0.164, an SEM shows film thickness was in the range of 552.20 ± 5.30 µm, having a rate-controlling membrane of 616.6 ± 62.12 nm in thickness,  and cumulative amount of drug permeated (0.398 mg) in Ex vivo drug permeation study.

Conclusions: The developed ocular insert offers a promising sustained-release platform for sulfacetamide sodium, potentially improving patient compliance and therapeutic outcomes in the management of bacterial ocular infections.

 

Author Biographies

  • Athmar Dhahir Habeeb Al-Shohani, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq

    Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq

  • Asma Buanz , School of Science, Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Kent, UK

    School of Science, Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Greenwich, Kent, UK

References

1- Jaffet J, Pingali T, Raut AK, Mohapatra S, Singh V. Eye: Anatomy, Physiology, and Disease. In: Mehra NK, editor. Complex Ophthalmic Dosage Forms: Advances in Biomedical Applications and Future Perspectives. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2025. p. 45-69.

2- Kumar NM, Mah FS. Bacterial, Chlamydial, and Mycobacterial Infections. In: Albert D, Miller J, Azar D, Young LH, editors. Albert and Jakobiec's Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 1-27.

3- Astley RA, Mursalin MH, Coburn PS, Livingston ET, Nightengale JW, Bagaruka E, et al. Ocular Bacterial Infections: A Ten-Year Survey and Review of Causative Organisms Based on the Oklahoma Experience. Microorganisms [Internet]. 2023; 11(7).

4- Høvding G. Acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2008;86(1):5-17.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01006.x

5- Youssef AA, Thakkar R, Senapati S, Joshi PH, Dudhipala N, Majumdar S. Design of Topical Moxifloxacin Mucoadhesive Nanoemulsion for the Management of Ocular Bacterial Infections. Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2022; 14(6).

6- Azari AA, Barney NP. Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review of Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 2013;310(16):1721-30.10.1001/jama.2013.280318

7- Ali MI, Humeidy IT. Spectrophotometric Determination of Sodium Sulfacetamide Using Pyrocatechol as an Oxidative Coupling Agent. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry. 2024;24(2):348.10.22146/ijc.85846

8- Sobhani Z, Mohammadi-Samani S, Arazi MR. Optimization parameters to prepare chitosan nanoparticles containing sulfacetamide sodium. Trends in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020;6(3):213-20.10.30476/tips.2020.87659.1064

9- Bu J. The comparison of sodium sulfacetamide and erythromycin in treating trachoma. Theoretical and Natural Science. 2024;45(1):94-101.10.54254/2753-8818/45/20240533

10- Ahmad I, Ahmad T, Usmanghani K. Sulfacetamide. In: Brittain HG, editor. Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances and Excipients. 23: Academic Press; 1994. p. 471-509.

11- Clarke EGC. Clarke's analysis of drugs and poisons: in pharmaceuticals, body fluids and postmortem material: Pharmaceutical Press; 2004.

12- Zhang J, Qian S, Chen L, Wu M, Cai Y, Mou X, et al. Antifouling and antibacterial zwitterionic hydrogels as soft contact lens against ocular bacterial infections. European Polymer Journal. 2022;167:111037.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111037

13- Mandal S, Shiva K, Kumar KP, Goel S, Patel RK, Sharma S, et al. Ocular drug delivery system (ODDS): Exploration the challenges and approaches to improve ODDS. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences. 2021;9(2):88-94.10.18231/j.jpbs.2021.012

14- Rozi MF, Mohmad Sabere AS. Review on Conventional and Novel Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System. Journal of Pharmacy. 2021;1(1):19-26.10.31436/jop.v1i1.32

15- Raj V, Mazumder R, Madhra M. Ocular drug delivery system: Challenges and approaches. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:49-57.10.22159/ijap.2020v12i5.38762

16- Ashique S, Mishra N, Mohanto S, Gowda BHJ, Kumar S, Raikar AS, et al. Overview of processed excipients in ocular drug delivery: Opportunities so far and bottlenecks. Heliyon. 2024;10(1):e23810.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23810

17- Shadambikar G, Marathe S, Patil A, Joshi R, Bandari S, Majumdar S, et al. Novel Application of Hot Melt Extrusion Technology for Preparation and Evaluation of Valacyclovir Hydrochloride Ocular Inserts. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021;22(1):48.10.1208/s12249-020-01916-5

18- Snehaprabha BA. Design of ocular controlled release ocuserts of brinzolamide. Int J Pharm. 2016;6:191-202

19- Pelusi L, Mandatori D, Mastropasqua L, Agnifili L, Allegretti M, Nubile M, et al. Innovation in the Development of Synthetic and Natural Ocular Drug Delivery Systems for Eye Diseases Treatment: Focusing on Drug-Loaded Ocular Inserts, Contacts, and Intraocular Lenses. Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2023; 15(2).

20- Omer S, Zelkó R. A Systematic Review of Drug-Loaded Electrospun Nanofiber-Based Ophthalmic Inserts. Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2021; 13(10).

21- Lee A, Blair HA. Dexamethasone Intracanalicular Insert: A Review in Treating Post-Surgical Ocular Pain and Inflammation. Drugs. 2020;80(11):1101-8.10.1007/s40265-020-01344-6

22- Kurade DS, Joshi D, Anita B. A review on ocular drug delivery with new trends. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2015;3(11):629-42

23- Karnik I, Youssef AAA, Joshi P, Munnangi SR, Narala S, Varner C, et al. Formulation development and characterization of dual drug loaded hot-melt extruded inserts for better ocular therapeutic outcomes: Sulfacetamide/prednisolone. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2023;84:104558.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104558

24- Azari AA, Arabi A. Conjunctivitis: A Systematic Review. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2020;15(3):372-95.10.18502/jovr.v15i3.7456

25- Abbas M, Khan S, Sadozai S, Wahab A, Khan F, Hussain S, et al. Gelatin-PAA Hybrid Nanoparticles for Sustained Release Drug Delivery against Conjunctivitis Causing Pathogen. LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY. 2020;39:2536-80

26- Vagdevi P, Kumar S, Sreemouni V, Kumar V, Vankadari RMG. FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF SODIUM CROMOGLYCATE OCUSERTS. WORLD JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES. 2018;7.10.20959/wjpps20185-11482

27- Rohit J, Vaibhav V, Mohit M, Prachi F, Shrutika B, Abhishek G. Formulation, Optimization and Evaluation of Ocular Inserts Containing Anti-Fungal Drug. Journal of Coastal Life Medicine. 2023;11(2):252-9

28- Nair RV, S S, Suresh A, K.R A, Nair SC. Sustained release timolol maleate loaded ocusert based on biopolymer composite. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2018;110:308-17.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.029

29- Alotaibi TA, Iyire A, Assaf S, Dahmash EZ. Development and characterization of niosomes loaded mucoadhesive biodegradable ocular inserts for extended release of pilocarpine HCl. Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024;10(1):22.10.1186/s43094-024-00598-1

30- Guadarrama-Escobar OR, Valdés-Alvarez CA, Constantino-Gonzalez KS, Serrano-Castañeda P, Peña-Juárez MC, Morales-Florido MI, et al. Design and Characterization of Ocular Inserts Loaded with Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Inflammatory Ophthalmic Disease. Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2024; 16(2).

31- Terreni E, Chetoni P, Burgalassi S, Tampucci S, Zucchetti E, Chipala E, et al. A hybrid ocular delivery system of cyclosporine-A comprising nanomicelle-laden polymeric inserts with improved efficacy and tolerability. Biomaterials Science. 2021;9(24):8235-48.10.1039/D1BM01453F

32- Farahmandnejad M, Alipour S, Nokhodchi A. Physical and mechanical properties of ocular thin films: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Discovery Today. 2024;29(5):103964.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103964

33- Gajbhiye K, Hakam N, Rathod G, Tawar M. Formulation and evaluation of transdermal patches of benidipine hydrochloride. Asian J Ph I Tech. 2021;11(3):207-12.doi: 10.52711/2231-5713.2021.00034

34- Mirzaeei S, Taghe S, Alany RG, Nokhodchi A. Eudragit® L100/Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanoparticles Impregnated Mucoadhesive Films as Ocular Inserts for Controlled Delivery of Erythromycin: Development, Characterization and In Vivo Evaluation. Biomedicines [Internet]. 2022; 10(8).

35- Zafar A, Imam SS, Yasir M, Alruwaili NK, Alsaidan OA, Warsi MH, et al. Preparation of NLCs-Based Topical Erythromycin Gel: In Vitro Characterization and Antibacterial Assessment. Gels. 2022;8(2).doi: 10.3390/gels8020116

36- Espartero LJL, Ishaq Z, Bradley S, Moore M, Yamada M, Wang X, et al. Dermal permeation of perfluoroalkyl substances in human skin – An in-vitro study. Chemosphere. 2025;378:144408.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144408

37- Nagpal MA, Sharma K, Anand N, Singh D, Dhawan R, Usman MRM, et al. Preparation and evaluation of sulfacetamide sodium ocusert for controlled drug delivery. J Drug Del I Thera. 2020;10(2):164-70.doi: 10.22270/jddt.v10i2.3928

38- Dayoub RA, Laham A. Preparation and In-vitro Evaluation of Timolol Maleate Loaded Ocular inserts by using various polymers. Res J Pharma I Tech. 2023;16(3):1259-66.doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00208

39- Safa Mohammed N, Athmar Dhahir Habeeb A-S, Alaa A. Effect of using high molecular weight crosslinker on the physical properties of super porous hydrogel composite. Al Mustansiriyah Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2023;23(4):355-66.10.32947/ajps.v23i4.1091

40- Alanazi F, Abdel Rahman A, Mahrous G, Alsarra I. Formulation and physicochemical characterisation of buccoadhesive films containing ketorolac. Journal of drug delivery science and technology. 2007;17(3):183-92

41- Alsaidan OA, Zafar A, Yasir M, Alzarea SI, Alqinyah M, Khalid M. Development of Ciprofloxacin-Loaded Bilosomes In-Situ Gel for Ocular Delivery: Optimization, In-Vitro Characterization, Ex-Vivo Permeation, and Antimicrobial Study. Gels [Internet]. 2022; 8(11).

42- Salem HF, Ali AA, Rabea YK, El-Ela FIA, Khallaf RA. Glycerosomal thermosensitive in situ gel of duloxetine HCl as a novel nanoplatform for rectal delivery: in vitro optimization and in vivo appraisal. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2022;12(12):3083-103.10.1007/s13346-022-01172-z

43- Taghe S, Mirzaeei S, Bagheri M. Preparation of polycaprolactone and polymethacrylate nanofibers for controlled ocular delivery of ketorolac tromethamine: Pharmacokinetic study in Rabbit's Eye. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2024;192:106631.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2023.106631

44- Taghe S, Mehrandish S, Mirzaeei S. Preparation of Azithromycin Nanofibers as Controlled Release Ophthalmic Drug Carriers Using Electrospinning Technique: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization. Adv Pharm Bull. 2022;12(2):346-55.10.34172/apb.2022.033

45- Teba HE, Khalil IA, Gebreel RM, Fahmy LI, Sorogy HME. Development of antifungal fibrous ocular insert using freeze-drying technique. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2024;14(9):2520-38.10.1007/s13346-024-01527-8

46- Saettone MF, Salminen L. Ocular inserts for topical delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 1995;16(1):95-106.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-409X(95)00014-X

47- Gevariya H, Dharamsi A, Girhepunje K, Pal R. Once a day ocular inserts for sustained delivery of levofloxacin: Design, formulation and evaluation. Asian J f Pharma). 2014;3(4).doi: 10.22377/ajp.v3i4.286

48- Gevariya H, Dharamsi A, Girhepunje K, Pal R. Once a day ocular inserts for sustained delivery of levofloxacin: Design, formulation and evaluation. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2009;3.10.4103/0973-8398.59954

49- Maddileti R, Chinthaginjala H. Elevating Therapeutic Potential: Levofloxacin-Loaded Ocular Films for Conjunctivitis Management. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2025;15(1)

50- Boateng JS, Popescu AM. Composite bi-layered erodible films for potential ocular drug delivery. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2016;145:353-61.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.014

51- Dawaba A, Dawaba H, El-Enin A, Khalifa M. Fabrication of bioadhesive ocusert with different polymers: Once a day dose. International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:309.10.22159/ijap.2018v10i6.28495

52- Gupta NV, Reddy G. A Comparative study of quality control tests for eye preparations as per IP, BP and USP. Int J Drug Dev & Res. 2015;7:0975-9344

53- Prabu D, Majdalawieh AF, Abu-Yousef IA, Inbasekaran K, Balasubramaniam T, Nallaperumal N, et al. Preparation and characterization of gatifloxacin-loaded sodium alginate hydrogel membranes supplemented with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose polymers for wound dressing. Int J Pharm Investig. 2016;6(2):86-95.10.4103/2230-973x.177810

54- Giri BR, Jakka D, Sandoval MA, Kulkarni VR, Bao Q. Advancements in Ocular Therapy: A Review of Emerging Drug Delivery Approaches and Pharmaceutical Technologies. Pharmaceutics [Internet]. 2024; 16(10).

55- Ahmed S, Amin MM, Sayed S. Ocular Drug Delivery: a Comprehensive Review. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2023;24(2):66.10.1208/s12249-023-02516-9

56- Heredia NS, Vizuete K, Flores-Calero M, Pazmiño V K, Pilaquinga F, Kumar B, et al. Comparative statistical analysis of the release kinetics models for nanoprecipitated drug delivery systems based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid). PLOS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0264825.10.1371/journal.pone.0264825

57- Aburahma MH, Mahmoud AA. Biodegradable Ocular Inserts for Sustained Delivery of Brimonidine Tartarate: Preparation and In Vitro/In Vivo Evaluation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011;12(4):1335-47.10.1208/s12249-011-9701-3

58- Malektaj H, Drozdov AD, deClaville Christiansen J. Mechanical Properties of Alginate Hydrogels Cross-Linked with Multivalent Cations. Polymers. 2023;15(14):3012

59- Roy N, Saha N. PVP-based hydrogels: Synthesis, properties and applications. Hydrogels: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications. 2012:227-52

60- Kwon TK, Lee KY, Im HT, Kim YI, Park JH, Woo JS. Formulation having improved pH-dependent drug-release characteristics, containing esomeprazole or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Google Patents; 2021.

61- Patel N, Lalwani D, Gollmer S, Injeti E, Sari Y, Nesamony J. Development and evaluation of a calcium alginate based oral ceftriaxone sodium formulation. Progress in Biomaterials. 2016;5(2):117-33.10.1007/s40204-016-0051-9

62- Lisa Land D, Benjamin WJ. Sizes and shapes of conjunctival inserts. International Contact Lens Clinic. 1994;21(11):212-7.https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-8967(94)90053-1

63- Bao Z, Yu A, Shi H, Hu Y, Jin B, Lin D, et al. Glycol chitosan/oxidized hyaluronic acid hydrogel film for topical ocular delivery of dexamethasone and levofloxacin. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;167:659-66.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.214

64- Ramadan AEh, Elsayed MMA, Elsayed A, Fouad MA, Mohamed MS, Lee S, et al. Development and optimization of vildagliptin solid lipid nanoparticles loaded ocuserts for controlled ocular delivery: A promising approach towards treating diabetic retinopathy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics: X. 2024;7:100232.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpx.2024.100232

65- Guadarrama-Escobar OR, Valdés-Alvarez CA, Constantino-Gonzalez KS, Serrano-Castañeda P, Peña-Juárez MC, Morales-Florido MI, et al. Design and Characterization of Ocular Inserts Loaded with Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Inflammatory Ophthalmic Disease. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(2):294

66- Repollu M, Haranath C. Precision Formulation of Ocular Films for Eye Infections using Innovative Quality by Design Optimization. Drug Metabolism and Bioanalysis Letters. 2024;17(2):88-98.http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0118723128364823250130094219

67- Yang Y, Sun H, Sun X, Wang Y, Xu F, Xia W, et al. From mechanism to applications: Advanced microneedles for clinical medicine. Bioact Mater. 2025;51:1-45.10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.04.025

68- Pokrovsky OS, Schott J. Kinetics and mechanism of forsterite dissolution at 25°C and pH from 1 to 12. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2000;64(19):3313-25.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00434-8

69- Saadallah M, Hamid O. Formulation and Evaluation of Rosuvastatin Calcium Polymeric Nanoparticles-Loaded Transdermal Patch. Iraqi Journal of Pharmacy. 2022;18.10.33899/iphr.2022.170395

70- Committee ES. Statistical Significance and Biological Relevance. EFSA Journal. 2011;9(9):2372.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2372

71- Mariz M, Murta J, Gil MH, Ferreira P. An ocular insert with zero-order extended delivery: Release kinetics and mathematical models. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2022;181:79-87.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.10.023

72- Desiato A, Iyire A, Bhogal-Bhamra G, Naroo SA, Gil-Cazorla R. Development and evaluation of ocular antibiotic-loaded soluble film inserts. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2025;48(3):102352.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102352

73- Ige P, Swami B, Patil T, Pradhan J, Patil P, Nerkar P, et al. Design and development of sustained release swelling matrix tablets of glipizide for type II diabetes mellitus. Farmacia. 2013;61:883-901

74- Dave V, Bensley D, Hoag S. Eudragit® RS PO/RL PO as rate-controlling matrix-formers via roller compaction: Influence of formulation and process variables on functional attributes of granules and tablets. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 2012;38:1240-53.10.3109/03639045.2011.645831

75- dos Santos J, da Silva GS, Velho MC, Beck RC. Eudragit®: A Versatile Family of Polymers for Hot Melt Extrusion and 3D Printing Processes in Pharmaceutics. Pharma. 2021;13(9).doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13091424

76- Boateng JS, Popescu AM. Composite bi-layered erodible films for potential ocular drug delivery. Collo Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2016;145:353-61.doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.014

77- Haznedar S, Dortunç B. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of Eudragit microspheres containing acetazolamide. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2004;269(1):131-40.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.09.015

78- Krajacic A, Tucker IG. Matrix formation in sustained release tablets: possible mechanism of dose dumping. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2003;251(1):67-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00584-7

79- Aboutaleb AA, Abdel-Rahman SI, Abdel-Aleem JA. Controlled Release Tablet Formulations of Isoxsuprine Hydrochloride Using Direct Compression Technique. Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences Assiut University. 2012;35(1):83-95

80- Ha J-M, Kim J-Y, Oh T-O, Rhee Y-S, Chi S-C, Kuk H, et al. Preparation and evaluation of sustained-release doxazosin mesylate pellets. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2013;61(4):371-8

81- Maderuelo C, Zarzuelo A, Lanao JM. Critical factors in the release of drugs from sustained release hydrophilic matrices. J Con Rel. 2011;154(1):2-19.doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.04.002

82- Jumelle C, Gholizadeh S, Annabi N, Dana R. Advances and limitations of drug delivery systems formulated as eye drops. J Con Rel. 2020;321:1-22.doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.01.057

83- Sultana Y, Aqil M, Ali A. Ocular inserts for controlled delivery of pefloxacin mesylate: Preparation and evaluation. Acta pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia). 2005;55:305-14

84- Bernards D, Bhisitkul R, Desai T. Zero-order sustained drug delivery to the retina from a nanoporous film device. Journal of Drug Delivery. 2014;48:20-1

85- Bin-Jumah M, Gilani SJ, Jahangir MA, Zafar A, Alshehri S, Yasir M, et al. Clarithromycin-Loaded Ocular Chitosan Nanoparticle: Formulation, Optimization, Characterization, Ocular Irritation, and Antimicrobial Activity. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:7861-75.10.2147/ijn.S269004

86- Gilhotra RM, Gilhotra N, Mishra DN. Piroxicam Bioadhesive Ocular Inserts: Physicochemical Characterization and Evaluation in Prostaglandin-Induced Inflammation. Curr Eye Res. 2009;34(12):1065-73.doi: 10.3109/02713680903340738

87- Bin-Jumah M, Gilani SJ, Jahangir MA, Zafar A, Alshehri S, Yasir M, et al. Clarithromycin-Loaded Ocular Chitosan Nanoparticle: Formulation, Optimization, Characterization, Ocular Irritation, and Antimicrobial Activity. Inter J Nano. 2020;15(null):7861-75.doi: 10.2147/IJN.S269004

88- Cegielska O, Sierakowski M, Sajkiewicz P, Lorenz K, Kogermann K. Mucoadhesive brinzolamide-loaded nanofibers for alternative glaucoma treatment. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2022;180:48-62.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.09.008

89- Cegielska O, Sierakowski M, Sajkiewicz P, Lorenz K, Kogermann K. Mucoadhesive brinzolamide-loaded nanofibers for alternative glaucoma treatment. Eur J Pharma I Biopharma. 2022;180:48-62.doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.09.008

90- Noori MM, Al-Shohani ADHH, Yousif NZ. Fabrication and characterization of new combination ocular insert for the combined delivery of tinidazole and levofloxacin. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2023;80:2652-9.doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.008

91- Patil AV, Mahajan HS. Modified pea starch based ocular films of azelastine hydrochloride: Development and characterization. Carb Poly Tech I App. 2021;2:100078.doi: 10.1016/j.carpta.2021.100078

92- Mohammed SH, Ali WK. Preparation and characterization of taste masked valsartan by ion-exchange resin approach. Al Mustansiriyah Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2018;18(1):11-25.10.32947/ajps.v18i1.453

93- Saboo S, Kestur US, Flaherty DP, Taylor LS. Congruent Release of Drug and Polymer from Amorphous Solid Dispersions: Insights into the Role of Drug-Polymer Hydrogen Bonding, Surface Crystallization, and Glass Transition. Mol Pharma. 2020;17(4):1261-75.doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b01272

94- Karas LJ, Wu C-H, Das R, Wu JI-C. Hydrogen bond design principles. WIREs Comp Mol Sci. 2020;10(6):e1477.doi: 10.1002/wcms.1477

Downloads

Published

2026-01-07

How to Cite

Preparation and Formulation of Ocusert using Dipping and Solvent Casting Technique. (2026). Al Mustansiriyah Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 25(5), 1090-1116. https://doi.org/10.32947/ajps.v25i5.1319

Similar Articles

41-50 of 353

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.